You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Associations of urinary sodium excretion with cardiovascular events in individuals with and without hypertension: a pooled analysis of data from four studies
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Lancet, May 2016
|
DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30467-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Andrew Mente, Martin O'Donnell, Sumathy Rangarajan, Gilles Dagenais, Scott Lear, Matthew McQueen, Rafael Diaz, Alvaro Avezum, Patricio Lopez-Jaramillo, Fernando Lanas, Wei Li, Yin Lu, Sun Yi, Lei Rensheng, Romaina Iqbal, Prem Mony, Rita Yusuf, Khalid Yusoff, Andrzej Szuba, Aytekin Oguz, Annika Rosengren, Ahmad Bahonar, Afzalhussein Yusufali, Aletta Elisabeth Schutte, Jephat Chifamba, Johannes F E Mann, Sonia S Anand, Koon Teo, S Yusuf, EPIDREAM and ONTARGET/TRANSCEND Investigators PURE |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 371 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 62 | 17% |
Spain | 26 | 7% |
United Kingdom | 26 | 7% |
Canada | 17 | 5% |
Australia | 11 | 3% |
Brazil | 9 | 2% |
Japan | 9 | 2% |
Ireland | 6 | 2% |
Belgium | 4 | 1% |
Other | 43 | 12% |
Unknown | 158 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 260 | 70% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 62 | 17% |
Scientists | 45 | 12% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 548 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
Kenya | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Israel | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 539 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 75 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 57 | 10% |
Student > Master | 56 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 54 | 10% |
Other | 50 | 9% |
Other | 140 | 26% |
Unknown | 116 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 220 | 40% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 35 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 2% |
Other | 63 | 11% |
Unknown | 151 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1024. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2024.
All research outputs
#15,943
of 25,870,142 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#451
of 43,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244
of 350,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#7
of 494 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,142 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 494 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.