↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Previous Medicaid Expansion May Have Had Lasting Positive Effects On Oral Health Of Non-Hispanic Black Children

Overview of attention for article published in Health Affairs, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
48 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Previous Medicaid Expansion May Have Had Lasting Positive Effects On Oral Health Of Non-Hispanic Black Children
Published in
Health Affairs, December 2016
DOI 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0865
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brandy J Lipton, Laura R Wherry, Sarah Miller, Genevieve M Kenney, Sandra Decker

Abstract

Healthy tooth development starts early in life, beginning even before birth. We present new evidence suggesting that a historic public health insurance expansion for pregnant women and children in the United States in the 1980s and 1990s may have had long-lasting effects on the oral health of the children gaining eligibility. We estimated the relationship between adult oral health and the extent of state public health insurance eligibility for pregnant women, infants, and children throughout childhood separately for non-Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic blacks, and Hispanics. We found that expanded Medicaid coverage geared toward pregnant women and children during their first year of life was linked to better oral health in adulthood among non-Hispanic blacks. Our results also suggested that there might be a benefit to expanded public health insurance eligibility for children at ages 1-6 among non-Hispanic blacks and Hispanics. Medicaid expansions appear to have had long-lasting effects for certain low-income children and helped narrow racial/ethnic disparities in adult oral health.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 10 23%
Unknown 10 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 34%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 11%
Social Sciences 5 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 13 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2023.
All research outputs
#695,692
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Health Affairs
#1,452
of 6,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,183
of 416,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Affairs
#39
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,505 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.