| Title |
Brief Mindfulness Practices for Healthcare Providers – A Systematic Literature Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Medicine, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.05.041 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Heather Gilmartin, Anupama Goyal, Mary C. Hamati, Jason Mann, Sanjay Saint, Vineet Chopra |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 28 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 12% |
| Spain | 7 | 8% |
| Australia | 3 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 4% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Ireland | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 53 | 62% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 19% |
| Scientists | 15 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 407 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 407 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 59 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 44 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 44 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 9% |
| Researcher | 29 | 7% |
| Other | 78 | 19% |
| Unknown | 117 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 89 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 67 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 41 | 10% |
| Unknown | 131 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2023.
All research outputs
#661,494
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Medicine
#295
of 8,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,639
of 329,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Medicine
#6
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,001 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.