Title |
Measuring how countries adapt to societal aging
|
---|---|
Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, January 2018
|
DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1720899115 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Dana P. Goldman, Cynthia Chen, Julie Zissimopoulos, John W. Rowe, John W. Rowe, Toni Antonucci, Lisa Berkman, Axel Borsch Supan, Laura Carstensen, Dana P. Goldman, Linda Fried, Frank Furstenberg, James Jackson, Martin Kohli, Jay Olshansky, David Rehkopf, John Rother, Julie Zissimopoulos |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 11 | 39% |
Hungary | 2 | 7% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
Canada | 1 | 4% |
Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
Ireland | 1 | 4% |
Brazil | 1 | 4% |
Australia | 1 | 4% |
Germany | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 6 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 19 | 68% |
Scientists | 6 | 21% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 15% |
Other | 8 | 15% |
Researcher | 7 | 13% |
Professor | 6 | 11% |
Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
Other | 9 | 16% |
Unknown | 13 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 8 | 15% |
Psychology | 5 | 9% |
Neuroscience | 4 | 7% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 7% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 5% |
Other | 11 | 20% |
Unknown | 20 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,580,724
of 25,416,581 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#21,051
of 103,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,540
of 451,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#411
of 975 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,416,581 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,040 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 975 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.