↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Endovascular Iliocaval Reconstruction for Chronic Iliocaval Thrombosis: The Data, Where We Are, and How It is Done

Overview of attention for article published in Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 174)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Endovascular Iliocaval Reconstruction for Chronic Iliocaval Thrombosis: The Data, Where We Are, and How It is Done
Published in
Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology, March 2018
DOI 10.1053/j.tvir.2018.03.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey Forris Beecham Chick, Ravi N Srinivasa, Kyle J Cooper, Neil Jairath, Anthony N Hage, Brooke Spencer, Steven D Abramowitz

Abstract

Iliocaval thrombosis, or thrombosis of the inferior vena cava and iliac veins, is associated with significant morbidity in the form of limb-threatening compromise from phlegmasia cerulean dolens, development of post-thrombotic syndrome, and death secondary to pulmonary embolism. Endovascular iliocaval reconstruction is an effective treatment for iliocaval thrombosis with high levels of technical success, favorable clinical outcomes and stent patency rates, and few complications. It is often able to relieve the debilitating symptoms experienced by affected patients and is a viable option for patients who fail conservative management. This article presents an approach to endovascular iliocaval stent reconstruction in patients suffering from chronic iliocaval thrombosis that takes into consideration background, patient selection and indications, timing of intervention, procedural steps, technical considerations, postprocedural care, and outcomes, along with providing schematic illustrations that serve to outline iliocaval stent reconstruction and management of chronic venous occlusions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 19%
Student > Postgraduate 5 12%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 10 24%
Unknown 8 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 48%
Engineering 2 5%
Sports and Recreations 2 5%
Philosophy 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 14 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2018.
All research outputs
#2,734,120
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology
#5
of 174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,381
of 348,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 174 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them