↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Neurodegeneration in diabetic retinopathy: does it really matter?

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetologia, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
26 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
382 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
320 Mendeley
Title
Neurodegeneration in diabetic retinopathy: does it really matter?
Published in
Diabetologia, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00125-018-4692-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rafael Simó, Alan W. Stitt, Thomas W. Gardner

Abstract

The concept of diabetic retinopathy as a microvascular disease has evolved, in that it is now considered a more complex diabetic complication in which neurodegeneration plays a significant role. In this article we provide a critical overview of the role of microvascular abnormalities and neurodegeneration in the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy. A special emphasis is placed on the pathophysiology of the neurovascular unit (NVU), including the contributions of microvascular and neural elements. The potential mechanisms linking retinal neurodegeneration and early microvascular impairment, and the effects of neuroprotective drugs are summarised. Additionally, we discuss how the assessment of retinal neurodegeneration could be an important index of cognitive status, thus helping to identify individuals at risk of dementia, which will impact on current procedures for diabetes management. We conclude that glial, neural and microvascular dysfunction are interdependent and essential for the development of diabetic retinopathy. Despite this intricate relationship, retinal neurodegeneration is a critical endpoint and neuroprotection, itself, can be considered a therapeutic target, independently of its potential impact on microvascular disease. In addition, interventional studies targeting pathogenic pathways that impact the NVU are needed. Findings from these studies will be crucial, not only for increasing our understanding of diabetic retinopathy, but also to help to implement a timely and efficient personalised medicine approach for treating this diabetic complication.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 320 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 320 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 11%
Student > Bachelor 35 11%
Student > Master 28 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 8%
Researcher 25 8%
Other 58 18%
Unknown 113 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 91 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 4%
Neuroscience 12 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 3%
Other 38 12%
Unknown 129 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2021.
All research outputs
#2,138,920
of 24,135,931 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#1,127
of 5,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,189
of 332,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#30
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,135,931 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,221 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.