Title |
Science can be beautiful, but please don't call it basic
|
---|---|
Published by |
The Conversation, June 2017
|
Authors |
Lila Landowski |
Abstract |
Science is supremely beautiful, but can also be brutal and unforgiving if you stray from the well-worn pathways. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 82 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 35 | 43% |
United States | 5 | 6% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
Canada | 2 | 2% |
Spain | 2 | 2% |
Turkey | 1 | 1% |
Ireland | 1 | 1% |
Belgium | 1 | 1% |
India | 1 | 1% |
Other | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 30 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 50 | 61% |
Scientists | 22 | 27% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 10% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 83. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2019.
All research outputs
#516,729
of 25,405,598 outputs
Outputs from The Conversation
#65,025
of 185,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,035
of 329,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Conversation
#1,784
of 4,566 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,405,598 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 185,291 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 92.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,566 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.