| Title |
Reconstruction of Zika Virus Introduction in Brazil - Volume 23, Number 1—January 2017 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Emerging Infectious Diseases, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3201/eid2301.161274 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kate Zinszer, Kathryn Morrison, John S. Brownstein, Fatima Marinho, Alexandre F. Santos, Elaine O. Nsoesie |
| Abstract |
We estimated the speed of Zika virus introduction in Brazil by using confirmed cases at the municipal level. Our models indicate a southward pattern of introduction starting from the northeastern coast and a pattern of movement toward the western border with an average speed of spread of 42 km/day or 15,367 km/year. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 21 | 41% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 6% |
| Brazil | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Senegal | 1 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 14 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 61% |
| Scientists | 12 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 91 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 14 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 22% |
| Unknown | 19 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2018.
All research outputs
#967,872
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#1,125
of 9,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,226
of 440,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#21
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.