↓ Skip to main content

Livestock Susceptibility to Infection with Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus

Overview of attention for article published in Emerging Infectious Diseases, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
46 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
Title
Livestock Susceptibility to Infection with Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus
Published in
Emerging Infectious Diseases, February 2017
DOI 10.3201/eid2302.161239
Pubmed ID
Authors

Júlia Vergara-Alert, Judith M.A. van den Brand, W. Widagdo, Marta Muñoz, Stalin Raj, Debby Schipper, David Solanes, Ivan Cordón, Albert Bensaid, Bart L. Haagmans, Joaquim Segalés

Abstract

Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) cases continue to be reported, predominantly in Saudi Arabia and occasionally other countries. Although dromedaries are the main reservoir, other animal species might be susceptible to MERS coronavirus (MERS-CoV) infection and potentially serve as reservoirs. To determine whether other animals are potential reservoirs, we inoculated MERS-CoV into llamas, pigs, sheep, and horses and collected nasal and rectal swab samples at various times. The presence of MERS-CoV in the nose of pigs and llamas was confirmed by PCR, titration of infectious virus, immunohistochemistry, and in situ hybridization; seroconversion was detected in animals of both species. Conversely, in sheep and horses, virus-specific antibodies did not develop and no evidence of viral replication in the upper respiratory tract was found. These results prove the susceptibility of llamas and pigs to MERS-CoV infection. Thus, the possibility of MERS-CoV circulation in animals other than dromedaries, such as llamas and pigs, is not negligible.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 99 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 19%
Researcher 17 17%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 18 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 17%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 16 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 10%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 21 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2018.
All research outputs
#834,743
of 25,552,933 outputs
Outputs from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#990
of 9,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,407
of 449,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#16
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,552,933 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,764 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.