↓ Skip to main content

Increasing Antibiotic Resistance in Shigella spp. from Infected New York City Residents, New York, USA - Volume 23, Number 2—February 2017 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC

Overview of attention for article published in Emerging Infectious Diseases, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Increasing Antibiotic Resistance in Shigella spp. from Infected New York City Residents, New York, USA - Volume 23, Number 2—February 2017 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC
Published in
Emerging Infectious Diseases, February 2017
DOI 10.3201/eid2302.161203
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kenya Murray, Vasudha Reddy, John S. Kornblum, HaeNa Waechter, Ludwin F. Chicaiza, Inessa Rubinstein, Sharon Balter, Sharon K. Greene, Sarah L. Braunstein, Jennifer L. Rakeman, Catherine M. Dentinger

Abstract

Approximately 20% of Shigella isolates tested in New York City, New York, USA, during 2013-2015 displayed decreased azithromycin susceptibility. Case-patients were older and more frequently male and HIV infected than those with azithromycin-susceptible Shigella infection; 90% identified as men who have sex with men. Clinical interpretation guidelines for azithromycin resistance and outcome studies are needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Other 5 7%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 21 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 22 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,607,965
of 22,931,367 outputs
Outputs from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#1,796
of 9,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,868
of 420,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#36
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,931,367 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.