↓ Skip to main content

Spatiotemporal Fluctuations and Triggers of Ebola Virus Spillover - Volume 23, Number 3—March 2017 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC

Overview of attention for article published in Emerging Infectious Diseases, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
64 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
Title
Spatiotemporal Fluctuations and Triggers of Ebola Virus Spillover - Volume 23, Number 3—March 2017 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC
Published in
Emerging Infectious Diseases, March 2017
DOI 10.3201/eid2303.160101
Pubmed ID
Authors

John Paul Schmidt, Andrew W. Park, Andrew M. Kramer, Barbara A. Han, Laura W. Alexander, John M. Drake

Abstract

Because the natural reservoir of Ebola virus remains unclear and disease outbreaks in humans have occurred only sporadically over a large region, forecasting when and where Ebola spillovers are most likely to occur constitutes a continuing and urgent public health challenge. We developed a statistical modeling approach that associates 37 human or great ape Ebola spillovers since 1982 with spatiotemporally dynamic covariates including vegetative cover, human population size, and absolute and relative rainfall over 3 decades across sub-Saharan Africa. Our model (area under the curve 0.80 on test data) shows that spillover intensity is highest during transitions between wet and dry seasons; overall, high seasonal intensity occurs over much of tropical Africa; and spillover intensity is greatest at high (>1,000/km(2)) and very low (<100/km(2)) human population densities compared with intermediate levels. These results suggest strong seasonality in Ebola spillover from wild reservoirs and indicate particular times and regions for targeted surveillance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 119 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 16%
Student > Master 18 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 26 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 23%
Environmental Science 14 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 37 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2023.
All research outputs
#626,880
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#778
of 9,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,972
of 328,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#9
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,860 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.