| Title |
Cost of Nosocomial Outbreak Caused by NDM-1–Containing Klebsiella pneumoniae in the Netherlands, October 2015–January 2016
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Emerging Infectious Diseases, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3201/eid2309.161710 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Madelief Mollers, Suzanne P. Lutgens, Annelot F. Schoffelen, Peter M. Schneeberger, Anita W.M. Suijkerbuijk |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 72 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 26% |
| Canada | 6 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
| Italy | 3 | 4% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Japan | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 26 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 42 | 58% |
| Scientists | 16 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 10 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 24% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 20% |
| Unknown | 12 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2017.
All research outputs
#811,887
of 25,755,403 outputs
Outputs from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#974
of 9,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,473
of 325,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#6
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,755,403 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.