↓ Skip to main content

Off-Label Use of Bedaquiline in Children and Adolescents with Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis - Volume 23, Number 10—October 2017 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC

Overview of attention for article published in Emerging Infectious Diseases, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
29 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Off-Label Use of Bedaquiline in Children and Adolescents with Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis - Volume 23, Number 10—October 2017 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC
Published in
Emerging Infectious Diseases, October 2017
DOI 10.3201/eid2310.170303
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jay Achar, Cathy Hewison, Ana P. Cavalheiro, Alena Skrahina, Junia Cajazeiro, Parpieva Nargiza, Krzysztof Herboczek, Assliddin S. Rajabov, Jennifer Hughes, Gabriella Ferlazzo, James A. Seddon, Philipp du Cros

Abstract

We describe 27 children and adolescents <18 years of age who received bedaquiline during treatment for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. We report good treatment responses and no cessation attributable to adverse effects. Bedaquiline could be considered for use with this age group for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis when treatment options are limited.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 22%
Student > Master 11 15%
Other 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 5%
Student > Postgraduate 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 24 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 31%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 30 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,383,829
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#1,563
of 9,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,527
of 336,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#26
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.