| Title |
US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Its Partners’ Contributions to Global Health Security - Volume 23, Supplement—December 2017 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Emerging Infectious Diseases, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3201/eid2313.170946 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jordan W. Tappero, Cynthia H. Cassell, Rebecca E. Bunnell, Frederick J. Angulo, Allen Craig, Nicki Pesik, Benjamin A. Dahl, Kashef Ijaz, Hamid Jafari, Rebecca Martin |
| Abstract |
To achieve compliance with the revised World Health Organization International Health Regulations (IHR 2005), countries must be able to rapidly prevent, detect, and respond to public health threats. Most nations, however, remain unprepared to manage and control complex health emergencies, whether due to natural disasters, emerging infectious disease outbreaks, or the inadvertent or intentional release of highly pathogenic organisms. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) works with countries and partners to build and strengthen global health security preparedness so they can quickly respond to public health crises. This report highlights selected CDC global health protection platform accomplishments that help mitigate global health threats and build core, cross-cutting capacity to identify and contain disease outbreaks at their source. CDC contributions support country efforts to achieve IHR 2005 compliance, contribute to the international framework for countering infectious disease crises, and enhance health security for Americans and populations around the world. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 213 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 71 | 33% |
| Argentina | 8 | 4% |
| Canada | 6 | 3% |
| India | 3 | 1% |
| Georgia | 3 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Nigeria | 3 | 1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Kenya | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 27 | 13% |
| Unknown | 85 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 158 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 30 | 14% |
| Scientists | 22 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 138 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 14% |
| Unknown | 47 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 26 | 19% |
| Unknown | 51 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 150. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2020.
All research outputs
#279,748
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#431
of 9,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,062
of 447,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#4
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.