| Title |
Detection of Zika Virus in April 2013 Patient Samples, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil - Volume 23, Number 12—December 2017 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Emerging Infectious Diseases, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3201/eid2312.171375 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sonia R. Lambert Passos, Maria A. Borges dos Santos, José Cerbino-Neto, Sibelle N. Buonora, Thiago M.L. Souza, Raquel V.C. de Oliveira, Alexandre Vizzoni, Giselle Barbosa-Lima, Yasmine R. Vieira, Marcondes Silva de Lima, Yara H. M. Hökerberg |
| Abstract |
We tested 210 dengue virus‒negative samples collected from febrile patients during a dengue virus type 4 outbreak in Rio de Janeiro in April 2013 and found 3 samples positive for Zika virus. Our findings support previously published entomological data suggesting Zika virus was introduced into Brazil during October 2012-May 2013. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 50% |
| Brazil | 2 | 11% |
| Kenya | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 94% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 15% |
| Researcher | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 18% |
| Unknown | 14 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 17 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2021.
All research outputs
#3,203,470
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#3,149
of 9,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,790
of 431,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#53
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.