Title |
Long-Term Viruria in Zika Virus–Infected Pregnant Women, Brazil, 2016 - Volume 23, Number 11—November 2017 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC
|
---|---|
Published in |
Emerging Infectious Diseases, November 2017
|
DOI | 10.3201/eid2311.170078 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ana Carolina B. Terzian, Cássia Fernanda Estofolete, Rafael Alves da Silva, Denise Cristina Mós Vaz-Oliani, Antonio Hélio Oliani, Cinara Cássia Brandão de Mattos, Luiz Carlos de Mattos, Paula Rahal, Maurício L. Nogueira |
Abstract |
During the 2016 Zika virus outbreak in Brazil, we detected Zika virus RNA in urine samples collected from Zika virus-positive pregnant women during different stages of pregnancy. Women had positive and negative intervals of viruria; 3 newborns had adverse outcomes. Further research is needed to clarify the relationship between viruria and outcomes for newborns. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 2 | 18% |
India | 1 | 9% |
Canada | 1 | 9% |
United States | 1 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 18% |
Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 11 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
Researcher | 5 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 8% |
Other | 13 | 20% |
Unknown | 19 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 17% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Other | 9 | 14% |
Unknown | 23 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 111. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2017.
All research outputs
#373,386
of 25,164,268 outputs
Outputs from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#526
of 9,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,861
of 335,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#9
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,164,268 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,683 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.