| Title |
Zoonotic Disease Programs for Enhancing Global Health Security - Volume 23, Supplement—December 2017 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Emerging Infectious Diseases, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3201/eid2313.170544 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ermias D. Belay, James C. Kile, Aron J. Hall, Casey Barton-Behravesh, Michele B. Parsons, Stephanie Salyer, Henry Walke |
| Abstract |
Most infectious diseases that recently emerged in humans originated in animals. Besides close contact between animals and humans, other factors probably contribute to the cross-species transmission of infectious diseases. It is critical to establish effective mechanisms for coordination and collaboration between the animal, human, and environmental health sectors before new threats emerge by bringing the different sectors together to tackle endemic zoonotic diseases of greatest concern. Such multisectoral partnerships should begin by identifying priority zoonotic diseases for national engagement with equal input from the different sectors. Improvements in surveillance and data sharing for prioritized zoonotic diseases and enhancements of laboratory testing and joint outbreak response capacities in the human and animal health sectors will create and strengthen the mechanisms necessary to effectively detect and respond to emerging health threats, and thereby enhance global health security. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 50% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Finland | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 63% |
| Scientists | 4 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 301 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 301 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 51 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 10% |
| Researcher | 30 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 37 | 12% |
| Unknown | 103 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 12% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 32 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 7% |
| Other | 58 | 19% |
| Unknown | 107 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,823,204
of 25,218,929 outputs
Outputs from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#2,020
of 9,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,043
of 450,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#41
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,218,929 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,700 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.