Title |
Deaths among Wild Birds during Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A(H5N8) Virus Outbreak, the Netherlands - Volume 23, Number 12—December 2017 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC
|
---|---|
Published in |
Emerging Infectious Diseases, December 2017
|
DOI | 10.3201/eid2312.171086 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Erik Kleyheeg, Roy Slaterus, Rogier Bodewes, Jolianne M. Rijks, Marcel A.H. Spierenburg, Nancy Beerens, Leon Kelder, Marjolein J. Poen, Jan A. Stegeman, Ron A.M. Fouchier, Thijs Kuiken, Henk P. van der Jeugd |
Abstract |
During autumn-winter 2016-2017, highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N8) viruses caused mass die-offs among wild birds in the Netherlands. Among the ≈13,600 birds reported dead, most were tufted ducks (Aythya fuligula) and Eurasian wigeons (Anas penelope). Recurrence of avian influenza outbreaks might alter wild bird population dynamics. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 14 | 35% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 10% |
Japan | 1 | 3% |
Germany | 1 | 3% |
Spain | 1 | 3% |
South Africa | 1 | 3% |
Denmark | 1 | 3% |
Korea, Republic of | 1 | 3% |
Australia | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 14 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 35 | 88% |
Scientists | 4 | 10% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 14 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 15% |
Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Unknown | 22 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 23% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 10 | 16% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 6% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Unknown | 24 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,001,013
of 25,651,057 outputs
Outputs from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#1,156
of 9,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,288
of 446,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#18
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,651,057 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,775 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.