| Title |
Prioritizing Zoonoses for Global Health Capacity Building—Themes from One Health Zoonotic Disease Workshops in 7 Countries, 2014–2016
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Emerging Infectious Diseases, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3201/eid2313.170418 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephanie J. Salyer, Rachel Silver, Kerri Simone, Casey Barton Behravesh |
| Abstract |
Zoonotic diseases represent critical threats to global health security. Effective mitigation of the impact of endemic and emerging zoonotic diseases of public health importance requires multisectoral collaboration and interdisciplinary partnerships. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention created the One Health Zoonotic Disease Prioritization Tool to help countries identify zoonotic diseases of greatest national concern using input from representatives of human health, agriculture, environment, and wildlife sectors. We review 7 One Health Zoonotic Disease Prioritization Tool workshops conducted during 2014-2016, highlighting workshop outcomes, lessons learned, and shared themes from countries implementing this process. We also describe the tool's ability to help countries focus One Health capacity-building efforts to appropriately prevent, detect, and respond to zoonotic disease threats. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 25% |
| Canada | 3 | 6% |
| Chile | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Nigeria | 2 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Thailand | 1 | 2% |
| Singapore | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 21 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 40 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 13% |
| Scientists | 5 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 359 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 359 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 53 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 10% |
| Researcher | 29 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 4% |
| Other | 57 | 16% |
| Unknown | 138 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 11% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 36 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 18 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 73 | 20% |
| Unknown | 145 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 390. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2024.
All research outputs
#78,420
of 25,396,120 outputs
Outputs from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#182
of 9,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,788
of 444,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#4
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,396,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.