↓ Skip to main content

Synergies between Communicable and Noncommunicable Disease Programs to Enhance Global Health Security

Overview of attention for article published in Emerging Infectious Diseases, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
Title
Synergies between Communicable and Noncommunicable Disease Programs to Enhance Global Health Security
Published in
Emerging Infectious Diseases, December 2017
DOI 10.3201/eid2313.170581
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deliana Kostova, Muhammad J. Husain, David Sugerman, Yuling Hong, Mona Saraiya, Jennifer Keltz, Samira Asma

Abstract

Noncommunicable diseases are the leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Initiatives that advance the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases support the goals of global health security in several ways. First, in addressing health needs that typically require long-term care, these programs can strengthen health delivery and health monitoring systems, which can serve as necessary platforms for emergency preparedness in low-resource environments. Second, by improving population health, the programs might help to reduce susceptibility to infectious outbreaks. Finally, in aiming to reduce the economic burden associated with premature illness and death from noncommunicable diseases, these initiatives contribute to the objectives of international development, thereby helping to improve overall country capacity for emergency response.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 109 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 24%
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Student > Postgraduate 4 4%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 34 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 13%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 41 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2022.
All research outputs
#3,623,183
of 23,033,713 outputs
Outputs from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#3,341
of 9,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,329
of 438,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#79
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,033,713 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.