↓ Skip to main content

Ending the HIV/AIDS Pandemic - Volume 24, Number 3—March 2018 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC

Overview of attention for article published in Emerging Infectious Diseases, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
28 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
11 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
117 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
324 Mendeley
Title
Ending the HIV/AIDS Pandemic - Volume 24, Number 3—March 2018 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC
Published in
Emerging Infectious Diseases, March 2018
DOI 10.3201/eid2403.171797
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert Walter Eisinger, Anthony S. Fauci

Abstract

The goal of ending the HIV/AIDS pandemic is theoretically achievable and would require addressing this global health catastrophe on individual and global levels by providing optimal prevention strategies and treatment regimens for individual persons living with or at risk for HIV, as well as ending the pandemic as an epidemiologic and global health phenomenon. However, from a practical standpoint, the pathway to ending the HIV/AIDS pandemic will be difficult and will require aggressive implementation of the biomedical research advances that have been made in the areas of treatment and prevention; development of additional tools, such as a moderately effective HIV vaccine; and attention to critical behavioral and social determinants. An end to the HIV/AIDS pandemic can be achieved only with provision of sustained and additional resources at the local, regional, national, and global levels.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 324 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 324 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 48 15%
Student > Master 39 12%
Researcher 27 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 7%
Student > Postgraduate 17 5%
Other 32 10%
Unknown 138 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 6%
Social Sciences 12 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 3%
Other 47 15%
Unknown 146 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2024.
All research outputs
#669,289
of 25,175,727 outputs
Outputs from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#804
of 9,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,276
of 336,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#10
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,175,727 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,683 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,993 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.