Title |
Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Antibodies in Dromedary Camels, Bangladesh, 2015 - Volume 24, Number 5—May 2018 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC
|
---|---|
Published in |
Emerging Infectious Diseases, May 2018
|
DOI | 10.3201/eid2405.171192 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ariful Islam, Jonathan H. Epstein, Melinda K. Rostal, Shariful Islam, Mohammed Ziaur Rahman, Mohammed Enayet Hossain, Mohammed Salim Uzzaman, Vincent J. Munster, Malik Peiris, Meerjady Sabrina Flora, Mahmudur Rahman, Peter Daszak |
Abstract |
Dromedary camels are bred domestically and imported into Bangladesh. In 2015, of 55 camels tested for Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus in Dhaka, 17 (31%) were seropositive, including 1 bred locally. None were PCR positive. The potential for infected camels in urban markets could have public health implications and warrants further investigation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 32% |
Switzerland | 3 | 14% |
Ecuador | 1 | 5% |
Australia | 1 | 5% |
Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
Réunion | 1 | 5% |
Germany | 1 | 5% |
Spain | 1 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 14% |
Unknown | 2 | 9% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 16 | 73% |
Scientists | 4 | 18% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 23% |
Researcher | 8 | 20% |
Student > Master | 6 | 15% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 9 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 15% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 5 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 10% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
Other | 9 | 23% |
Unknown | 10 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,539,381
of 23,510,717 outputs
Outputs from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#2,590
of 9,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,503
of 327,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#40
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,510,717 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.