Title |
Pathogenic Leptospira Species in Insectivorous Bats, China, 2015 - Volume 24, Number 6—June 2018 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC
|
---|---|
Published in |
Emerging Infectious Diseases, June 2018
|
DOI | 10.3201/eid2406.171585 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hui-Ju Han, Hong-Ling Wen, Jian-Wei Liu, Xiang-Rong Qin, Min Zhao, Li-Jun Wang, Li-Mei Luo, Chuan-Min Zhou, Ye-Lei Zhu, Rui Qi, Wen-Qian Li, Hao Yu, Xue-Jie Yu |
Abstract |
PCR amplification of the rrs2 gene indicated that 50% (62/124) of insectivorous bats from eastern China were infected with Leptospira borgpetersenii, L. kirschneri, and several potentially new Leptospira species. Multilocus sequence typing defined 3 novel sequence types in L. kirschneri, suggesting that bats are major carriers of Leptospira. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 33% |
Australia | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
Researcher | 4 | 9% |
Professor | 2 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 9% |
Unknown | 18 | 42% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 11 | 26% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 14% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 9% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 17 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2018.
All research outputs
#14,390,935
of 23,047,237 outputs
Outputs from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#7,248
of 9,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,881
of 330,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#84
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,047,237 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.8. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.