| Title |
In Vivo Selection of a Unique Tandem Repeat Mediated Azole Resistance Mechanism (TR<sub>120</sub>) in <em>Aspergillus fumigatus cyp51A</em>, Denmark - Volume 25, Number 3—March 2019 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Emerging Infectious Diseases, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3201/eid2503.180297 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rasmus K. Hare, Jan B. Gertsen, Karen M.T. Astvad, Kristine B. Degn, Anders Løkke, Marc Stegger, Paal S. Andersen, Lise Kristensen, Maiken C. Arendrup |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 25% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 8% |
| India | 1 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 15% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 11 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2023.
All research outputs
#5,414,235
of 25,403,829 outputs
Outputs from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#4,372
of 9,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,057
of 368,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#59
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,403,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,720 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.