| Title |
Elizabethkingia anophelis Infection in Infants, Cambodia, 2012–2018 - Volume 26, Number 2—February 2020 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Emerging Infectious Diseases, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3201/eid2602.190345 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas A.N. Reed, Gabriella Watson, Chheng Kheng, Pisey Tan, Tamalee Roberts, Clare L. Ling, Thyl Miliya, Paul Turner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 25% |
| Cambodia | 2 | 17% |
| Thailand | 1 | 8% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 50% |
| Scientists | 6 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 31% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
| Professor | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 15% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 15% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,266,944
of 25,551,063 outputs
Outputs from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#3,810
of 9,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,106
of 474,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#50
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,551,063 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 474,663 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.