↓ Skip to main content

Improvement in patients with a TMD‐pain report. A 6‐month follow‐up study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improvement in patients with a TMD‐pain report. A 6‐month follow‐up study
Published in
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, October 2012
DOI 10.1111/joor.12009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rollman, A., Visscher, C. M., Gorter, R. C., Naeije, M.

Abstract

Even though chronic TMD pain tends to persist in most patients, some chronic patients show improvement. It is largely unknown which factors contribute to the improvement of chronic pain. The aim of this study is to investigate which factors, from a biopsychosocial perspective, help to predict improvement in patients with a report of TMD pain.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Egypt 2 8%
Germany 1 4%
Unknown 23 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 23%
Student > Master 6 23%
Student > Postgraduate 4 15%
Researcher 3 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Other 5 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 65%
Unspecified 4 15%
Psychology 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 2 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2012.
All research outputs
#4,644,982
of 6,281,255 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
#150
of 247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,429
of 87,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,281,255 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 247 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.