↓ Skip to main content

Privacy and Identity Management. Time for a Revolution?

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Privacy and Identity Management. Time for a Revolution?'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Modelling the Relationship Between Privacy and Security Perceptions and the Acceptance of Surveillance Practices
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 The US Privacy Strategy
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 SmartSociety: Collaboration Between Humans and Machines, Promises and Perils
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 An Experience with a De-identifying Task to Inform About Privacy Issues
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 A4Cloud Workshop: Accountability in the Cloud
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Signatures for Privacy, Trust and Accountability in the Cloud: Applications and Requirements
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Report on the Workshop on Assessing the Maturity of Privacy Enhancing Technologies
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Smart Technologies – Workshop on Challenges and Trends for Privacy in a Hyper-connected World
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Privacy Pattern Catalogue: A Tool for Integrating Privacy Principles of ISO/IEC 29100 into the Software Development Process
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Developing a Structured Metric to Measure Privacy Risk in Privacy Impact Assessments
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Accountability in the EU Data Protection Reform: Balancing Citizens’ and Business’ Rights
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Towards Authenticity and Privacy Preserving Accountable Workflows
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 A Technique for Enhanced Provision of Appropriate Access to Evidence Across Service Provision Chains
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Evidence-Based Security and Privacy Assurance in Cloud Ecosystems
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Enhanced Assurance About Cloud Service Provision Promises
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 ALOC: Attribute Level of Confidence for a User-Centric Attribute Assurance
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Identity-Theft Through e-Government Services – Government to Pay the Bill?
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 All Your Data Are Belong to us . European Perspectives on Privacy Issues in ‘Free’ Online Machine Translation Services
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Identification of Online Gamblers in the EU: A Two-Edged Sword
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Can Courts Provide Effective Remedies Against Violations of Fundamental Rights by Mass Surveillance? The Case of the United Kingdom
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Automated Log Audits for Privacy Compliance Validation: A Literature Survey
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Privacy-Preserving Access Control in Publicly Readable Storage Systems
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Ontology-Based Obfuscation and Anonymisation for Privacy
Attention for Chapter 1: Modelling the Relationship Between Privacy and Security Perceptions and the Acceptance of Surveillance Practices
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Modelling the Relationship Between Privacy and Security Perceptions and the Acceptance of Surveillance Practices
Chapter number 1
Book title
Privacy and Identity Management. Time for a Revolution?
Published in
IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-41763-9_1
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-941762-2, 978-3-31-941763-9
Authors

Michael Friedewald, Marc van Lieshout, Sven Rung, Friedewald, Michael, van Lieshout, Marc, Rung, Sven

Editors

David Aspinall, Jan Camenisch, Marit Hansen, Simone Fischer-Hübner, Charles Raab

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 25%
Other 2 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 17%
Researcher 2 17%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 4 33%
Social Sciences 4 33%
Psychology 2 17%
Engineering 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2017.
All research outputs
#4,993,216
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,051
of 373,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.