↓ Skip to main content

#RadEd: How and Why to Use Twitter for Online Radiology Education

Overview of attention for article published in Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
#RadEd: How and Why to Use Twitter for Online Radiology Education
Published in
Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology, February 2021
DOI 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2021.02.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lilly Kauffman, Edmund M Weisberg, Whitney Fishman Zember, Elliot K Fishman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 4 17%
Researcher 4 17%
Other 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 4 17%
Social Sciences 4 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 7 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2021.
All research outputs
#7,210,695
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology
#201
of 515 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,493
of 537,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology
#10
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 515 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 537,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.