↓ Skip to main content

ESICM LIVES 2020

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
364 Mendeley
Title
ESICM LIVES 2020
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, December 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40635-020-00354-8
Pubmed ID

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 364 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 364 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 52 14%
Student > Master 34 9%
Unspecified 32 9%
Other 19 5%
Researcher 14 4%
Other 65 18%
Unknown 148 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 55 15%
Unspecified 32 9%
Sports and Recreations 11 3%
Computer Science 9 2%
Other 45 12%
Unknown 155 43%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2021.
All research outputs
#14,215,811
of 21,168,082 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#230
of 405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,189
of 417,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,168,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 405 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,495 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them