You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Differences in the spatial landscape of urban mobility: Gender and socioeconomic perspectives
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0260874 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mariana Macedo, Laura Lotero, Alessio Cardillo, Ronaldo Menezes, Hugo Barbosa |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
| Italy | 2 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Peru | 1 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 21 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 18 | 55% |
| Members of the public | 14 | 42% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 20% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 17 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 6 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 21 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2022.
All research outputs
#634,159
of 24,387,992 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#8,705
of 210,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,818
of 432,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#161
of 4,403 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,387,992 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 210,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,403 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.