↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

From “the Moon Is Rounder Abroad” to “Bravo, My Country”: How China Misperceives the World

Overview of attention for article published in Studies in Comparative International Development, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 327)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1253 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
From “the Moon Is Rounder Abroad” to “Bravo, My Country”: How China Misperceives the World
Published in
Studies in Comparative International Development, February 2021
DOI 10.1007/s12116-021-09322-z
Authors

Haifeng Huang

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,253 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 22%
Student > Master 4 17%
Lecturer 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Professor 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 6 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 10 43%
Philosophy 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 282. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2022.
All research outputs
#113,020
of 23,818,521 outputs
Outputs from Studies in Comparative International Development
#2
of 327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,962
of 552,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Studies in Comparative International Development
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,818,521 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 327 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 552,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them

This page is provided by Altmetric.