↓ Skip to main content

Spontaneous subepithelial hemorrhage: the Antopol-Goldman lesion

Overview of attention for article published in Einstein (São Paulo), January 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spontaneous subepithelial hemorrhage: the Antopol-Goldman lesion
Published in
Einstein (São Paulo), January 2021
DOI 10.31744/einstein_journal/2021ai5829
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eduardo Kaiser Ururahy Nunes Fonseca, Roberto Vitor Almeida Torres, Luiz Raphael Pereira Donoso Scoppetta, Cesar Higa Nomura

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2021.
All research outputs
#16,326,262
of 20,303,071 outputs
Outputs from Einstein (São Paulo)
#252
of 382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,483
of 314,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Einstein (São Paulo)
#14
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,303,071 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 382 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,371 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.