↓ Skip to main content

Enhanced top soil carbon stocks under organic farming

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
policy
6 policy sources
twitter
68 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
linkedin
1 LinkedIn user
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
555 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
875 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Enhanced top soil carbon stocks under organic farming
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, October 2012
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1209429109
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas Gattinger, Adrian Muller, Matthias Haeni, Colin Skinner, Andreas Fliessbach, Nina Buchmann, Paul Mäder, Matthias Stolze, Pete Smith, Nadia El-Hage Scialabba, Urs Niggli

Abstract

It has been suggested that conversion to organic farming contributes to soil carbon sequestration, but until now a comprehensive quantitative assessment has been lacking. Therefore, datasets from 74 studies from pairwise comparisons of organic vs. nonorganic farming systems were subjected to metaanalysis to identify differences in soil organic carbon (SOC). We found significant differences and higher values for organically farmed soils of 0.18 ± 0.06% points (mean ± 95% confidence interval) for SOC concentrations, 3.50 ± 1.08 Mg C ha(-1) for stocks, and 0.45 ± 0.21 Mg C ha(-1) y(-1) for sequestration rates compared with nonorganic management. Metaregression did not deliver clear results on drivers, but differences in external C inputs and crop rotations seemed important. Restricting the analysis to zero net input organic systems and retaining only the datasets with highest data quality (measured soil bulk densities and external C and N inputs), the mean difference in SOC stocks between the farming systems was still significant (1.98 ± 1.50 Mg C ha(-1)), whereas the difference in sequestration rates became insignificant (0.07 ± 0.08 Mg C ha(-1) y(-1)). Analyzing zero net input systems for all data without this quality requirement revealed significant, positive differences in SOC concentrations and stocks (0.13 ± 0.09% points and 2.16 ± 1.65 Mg C ha(-1), respectively) and insignificant differences for sequestration rates (0.27 ± 0.37 Mg C ha(-1) y(-1)). The data mainly cover top soil and temperate zones, whereas only few data from tropical regions and subsoil horizons exist. Summarizing, this study shows that organic farming has the potential to accumulate soil carbon.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 875 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 <1%
United States 4 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Czechia 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 849 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 175 20%
Student > Master 137 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 129 15%
Student > Bachelor 63 7%
Other 32 4%
Other 133 15%
Unknown 206 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 293 33%
Environmental Science 182 21%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 42 5%
Social Sciences 22 3%
Engineering 19 2%
Other 65 7%
Unknown 252 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 164. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2023.
All research outputs
#252,394
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#4,685
of 103,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,259
of 193,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#36
of 927 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,917 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 927 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.