↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of Two Clinical Upper Motor Neuron Burden Rating Scales in ALS Using Quantitative Brain Imaging

Overview of attention for article published in ACS Chemical Neuroscience, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of Two Clinical Upper Motor Neuron Burden Rating Scales in ALS Using Quantitative Brain Imaging
Published in
ACS Chemical Neuroscience, February 2021
DOI 10.1021/acschemneuro.0c00772
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meena M. Makary, Akila Weerasekara, Haley Rodham, Baileigh G. Hightower, Chieh-En J. Tseng, James Chan, Sheena Chew, Sabrina Paganoni, Eva-Maria Ratai, Nicole R. Zürcher, Jacob M. Hooker, Nazem Atassi, Suma Babu

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 10 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 6 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 10 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2021.
All research outputs
#4,839,541
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from ACS Chemical Neuroscience
#938
of 2,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,725
of 538,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACS Chemical Neuroscience
#33
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,749 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 538,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.