↓ Skip to main content

Progesterone vs. synthetic progestins and the risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 2,318)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
Title
Progesterone vs. synthetic progestins and the risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Systematic Reviews, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13643-016-0294-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Noor Asi, Khaled Mohammed, Qusay Haydour, Michael R. Gionfriddo, Oscar L. Morey Vargas, Larry J. Prokop, Stephanie S. Faubion, Mohammad Hassan Murad

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 136 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 17%
Other 14 10%
Researcher 13 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 42 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 45 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 423. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2024.
All research outputs
#74,133
of 26,771,611 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#4
of 2,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,469
of 330,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#1
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,771,611 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.