↓ Skip to main content

〈学習会報告〉子宮頸がんワクチン(HPVワクチン)接種被害についての学習会の記録

Overview of attention for article published in THE JAPAN SHAKAI RINSHO REVIEW, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
〈学習会報告〉子宮頸がんワクチン(HPVワクチン)接種被害についての学習会の記録
Published in
THE JAPAN SHAKAI RINSHO REVIEW, November 2020
DOI 10.24698/shakairinsho.28.1_26
Authors

日本社会臨床学会第XIV期運営委員会, 別府宏圀, 笹木美緒, 山田真美子, 山田泰輔, 山田慶子, 岩崎陽子, 山田真, 井上芳保

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2022.
All research outputs
#4,707,890
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from THE JAPAN SHAKAI RINSHO REVIEW
#4
of 20 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,417
of 440,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from THE JAPAN SHAKAI RINSHO REVIEW
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one scored the same or higher as 16 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them