↓ Skip to main content

Fruit consumption and cardiometabolic risk in the PREDIMED-plus study: A cross-sectional analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fruit consumption and cardiometabolic risk in the PREDIMED-plus study: A cross-sectional analysis
Published in
Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases, June 2021
DOI 10.1016/j.numecd.2021.02.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nerea Becerra-Tomás, Indira Paz-Graniel, Anna Tresserra-Rimbau, Miguel Á. Martínez-González, Laura Barrubés, Dolores Corella, Júlia Muñoz-Martínez, Dora Romaguera, Jesús Vioque, Ángel M. Alonso-Gómez, Julia Wärnberg, José A. Martínez, Luís Serra-Majem, Ramon Estruch, Maria R. Bernal-López, José Lapetra, Xavier Pintó, Josep A. Tur, Antonio Garcia-Rios, Blanca Riquelme Gallego, Miguel Delgado-Rodríguez, Pilar Matía-Martín, Lidia Daimiel, Sonsoles Velilla-Zancada, Josep Vidal, Clotilde Vázquez, Emilio Ros, Pilar Buil-Cosiales, Nancy Babio, Rebeca Fernández-Carrión, Karla A. Pérez-Vega, Marga Morey, Laura Torres-Collado, Lucas Tojal-Sierra, Jessica Pérez-López, Itziar Abete, Judith P. Cabrera, Rosa Casas, José C. Fernández-García, José M. Santos-Lozano, Virginia Esteve-Luque, Cristina Bouzas, Cesar I. Fernandez-Lazaro, José V. Sorlí, Gala Freixer, Marian Martín, Montserrat G. Muñoz, Itziar Salaverria-Lete, Estefania Toledo, Olga Castañer, Jordi Salas-Salvadó

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 21%
Student > Master 3 16%
Other 2 11%
Professor 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 5 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Chemistry 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,784,534
of 19,156,856 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases
#209
of 1,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,059
of 307,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases
#6
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,156,856 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,357 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.