↓ Skip to main content

Autologous platelet-rich plasma for treating chronic wounds

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Autologous platelet-rich plasma for treating chronic wounds
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006899.pub2
Authors

Maria José Martinez-Zapata, Arturo J Martí-Carvajal, Ivan Solà, José Angel Expósito, Ignasi Bolíbar, Luciano Rodríguez, Joan Garcia

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 104 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 17%
Researcher 17 16%
Student > Master 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Student > Postgraduate 10 9%
Other 34 31%
Unknown 8 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 10 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2015.
All research outputs
#3,839,945
of 14,726,021 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,574
of 11,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,829
of 145,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#44
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,726,021 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.