↓ Skip to main content

Computer-assisted resilience training to prepare healthcare workers for pandemic influenza: a randomized trial of the optimal dose of training

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
246 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Computer-assisted resilience training to prepare healthcare workers for pandemic influenza: a randomized trial of the optimal dose of training
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, March 2010
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-10-72
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert G Maunder, William J Lancee, Reet Mae, Leslie Vincent, Nathalie Peladeau, Mary Agnes Beduz, Jonathan J Hunter, Molyn Leszcz

Abstract

Working in a hospital during an extraordinary infectious disease outbreak can cause significant stress and contribute to healthcare workers choosing to reduce patient contact. Psychological training of healthcare workers prior to an influenza pandemic may reduce stress-related absenteeism, however, established training methods that change behavior and attitudes are too resource-intensive for widespread use. This study tests the feasibility and effectiveness of a less expensive alternative - an interactive, computer-assisted training course designed to build resilience to the stresses of working during a pandemic.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 246 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 244 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 13%
Student > Bachelor 30 12%
Researcher 28 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 9%
Other 50 20%
Unknown 59 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 48 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 45 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Other 38 15%
Unknown 76 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2021.
All research outputs
#6,915,761
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,390
of 7,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,339
of 94,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#10
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,582 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.