You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How to Capture Reciprocal Communication Dynamics: Comparing Longitudinal Statistical Approaches in Order to Analyze Within- and Between-Person Effects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Communication, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1093/joc/jqab003 |
| Authors |
Fabian Thomas, Adam Shehata, Lukas P Otto, Judith Möller, Elisabeth Prestele |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 27% |
| Austria | 2 | 13% |
| Sweden | 1 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 13 | 87% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Librarian | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 19% |
| Unknown | 20 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 23 | 39% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 5% |
| Psychology | 3 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 22 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2021.
All research outputs
#3,635,435
of 24,640,106 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Communication
#435
of 1,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,513
of 431,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Communication
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,640,106 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.