You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Combating ecosystem collapse from the tropics to the Antarctic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Global Change Biology, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1111/gcb.15539 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dana M. Bergstrom, Barbara C. Wienecke, John van den Hoff, Lesley Hughes, David B. Lindenmayer, Tracy D. Ainsworth, Christopher M. Baker, Lucie Bland, David M. J. S. Bowman, Shaun T. Brooks, Josep G. Canadell, Andrew J. Constable, Katherine A. Dafforn, Michael H. Depledge, Catherine R. Dickson, Norman C. Duke, Kate J. Helmstedt, Andrés Holz, Craig R. Johnson, Melodie A. McGeoch, Jessica Melbourne‐Thomas, Rachel Morgain, Emily Nicholson, Suzanne M. Prober, Ben Raymond, Euan G. Ritchie, Sharon A. Robinson, Katinka X. Ruthrof, Samantha A. Setterfield, Carla M. Sgrò, Jonathan S. Stark, Toby Travers, Rowan Trebilco, Delphi F. L. Ward, Glenda M. Wardle, Kristen J. Williams, Phillip J. Zylstra, Justine D. Shaw |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 857 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 227 | 26% |
| United States | 48 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 31 | 4% |
| Curaçao | 14 | 2% |
| Spain | 11 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 9 | 1% |
| Canada | 8 | <1% |
| Germany | 8 | <1% |
| Ireland | 6 | <1% |
| Other | 56 | 7% |
| Unknown | 439 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 676 | 79% |
| Scientists | 133 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 36 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 273 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 53 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 8% |
| Professor | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 34 | 12% |
| Unknown | 91 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 61 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 59 | 22% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Engineering | 8 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 31 | 11% |
| Unknown | 98 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 854. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2024.
All research outputs
#21,473
of 25,711,194 outputs
Outputs from Global Change Biology
#21
of 6,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#903
of 453,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Change Biology
#3
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.