↓ Skip to main content

Fine mapping of complex traits in non-model species: using next generation sequencing and advanced intercross lines in Japanese quail

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fine mapping of complex traits in non-model species: using next generation sequencing and advanced intercross lines in Japanese quail
Published in
BMC Genomics, October 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-13-551
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laure Frésard, Sophie Leroux, Patrice Dehais, Bertrand Servin, Hélène Gilbert, Olivier Bouchez, Christophe Klopp, Cédric Cabau, Florence Vignoles, Katia Feve, Amélie Ricros, David Gourichon, Christian Diot, Sabine Richard, Christine Leterrier, Catherine Beaumont, Alain Vignal, Francis Minvielle, Frédérique Pitel

Abstract

As for other non-model species, genetic analyses in quail will benefit greatly from a higher marker density, now attainable thanks to the evolution of sequencing and genotyping technologies. Our objective was to obtain the first genome wide panel of Japanese quail SNP (Single Nucleotide Polymorphism) and to use it for the fine mapping of a QTL for a fear-related behaviour, namely tonic immobility, previously localized on Coturnix japonica chromosome 1. To this aim, two reduced representations of the genome were analysed through high-throughput 454 sequencing: AFLP (Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism) fragments as representatives of genomic DNA, and EST (Expressed Sequence Tag) as representatives of the transcriptome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 4%
Portugal 1 2%
France 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Ireland 1 2%
Unknown 49 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 36%
Other 6 11%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 6 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 66%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 4%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 9 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2012.
All research outputs
#15,061,270
of 25,364,936 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#5,347
of 11,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,356
of 192,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#89
of 196 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,364,936 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 196 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.