| Title |
Apollo Lunar Astronauts Show Higher Cardiovascular Disease Mortality: Possible Deep Space Radiation Effects on the Vascular Endothelium
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/srep29901 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael D. Delp, Jacqueline M. Charvat, Charles L. Limoli, Ruth K. Globus, Payal Ghosh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 294 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 52 | 18% |
| Japan | 39 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 3% |
| Spain | 8 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 2% |
| France | 5 | 2% |
| Germany | 3 | 1% |
| Ireland | 3 | 1% |
| Argentina | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 28 | 10% |
| Unknown | 138 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 223 | 76% |
| Scientists | 34 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 21 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 15 | 5% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 239 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 235 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 15% |
| Researcher | 33 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 34 | 14% |
| Unknown | 61 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 31 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 10% |
| Engineering | 17 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 43 | 18% |
| Unknown | 67 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1971. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#4,796
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#72
of 142,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40
of 381,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1
of 3,662 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,941 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,662 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.