↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

That Which is Essential has been Made Invisible: The Need to Bring a Structural Risk Perspective to Reduce Racial Disproportionality in Child Welfare

Overview of attention for article published in Race and Social Problems, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 252)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
19 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Summary News Twitter
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
That Which is Essential has been Made Invisible: The Need to Bring a Structural Risk Perspective to Reduce Racial Disproportionality in Child Welfare
Published in
Race and Social Problems, February 2021
DOI 10.1007/s12552-021-09313-8
Pubmed ID
33643476
Authors

Megan Feely, Emily Adlin Bosk

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 17%
Professor 6 13%
Student > Master 4 9%
Researcher 3 6%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 10 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 12 26%
Psychology 8 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Unspecified 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 10 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,600,854
of 23,454,152 outputs
Outputs from Race and Social Problems
#50
of 252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,452
of 419,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Race and Social Problems
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,454,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.