↓ Skip to main content

Male involvement for increasing the effectiveness of prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission (PMTCT) programmes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
282 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Male involvement for increasing the effectiveness of prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission (PMTCT) programmes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009468.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Serena Brusamento, Elena Ghanotakis, Lorainne Tudor Car, Michelle HMMT van-Velthoven, Azeem Majeed, Josip Car

Abstract

Despite efforts to increase the uptake of prevention of mother to child transmission of HIV (PMTCT) services, coverage is still lower than desired in developing countries. A lack of male partner involvement in PMTCT services is a major barrier for women to access these services.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 282 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Tanzania, United Republic of 2 <1%
Kenya 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 275 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 61 22%
Student > Master 58 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 14%
Student > Bachelor 20 7%
Student > Postgraduate 19 7%
Other 41 15%
Unknown 44 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 103 37%
Social Sciences 37 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 13%
Psychology 13 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 3%
Other 35 12%
Unknown 50 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2012.
All research outputs
#6,743,736
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,077
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,653
of 139,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#54
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.