You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A living WHO guideline on drugs to prevent covid-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Medical Journal, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmj.n526 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
François Lamontagne, Miriam Stegemann, Arnav Agarwal, Thomas Agoritsas, Reed Siemieniuk, Bram Rochwerg, Jessica Bartoszko, Lisa Askie, Helen Macdonald, Muna Al-Maslamani, Wagdy Amin, Andre Ricardo Araujo Da Silva, Fabian Alberto Jaimes Barragan, Frederique Jacquerioz Bausch, Erlina Burhan, Maurizio Cecconi, Binila Chacko, Duncan Chanda, Vu Quoc Dat, Bin Du, Heike Geduld, Patrick Gee, Muhammad Haider, Nerina Harley, Madiha Hashimi, Fyezah Jehan, David Hui, Beverley J Hunt, Mohamed Ismail, Sushil Kabra, Seema Kanda, Leticia Kawano-Dourado, Yae-Jean Kim, Niranjan Kissoon, Sanjeev Krishna, Arthur Kwizera, Thiago Lisboa, Yee-Sin Leo, Imelda Mahaka, Manai Hela, Giovanni Battista Migliori, Greta Mino, Emmanuel Nsutebu, Natalia Pshenichnaya, Nida Qadir, Shalini Sri Ranganathan, Saniya Sabzwari, Rohit Sarin, Manu Shankar-Hari, Michael Sharland, Yinzhong Shen, Joao Paulo Souza, Tshokey, Sebastian Ugarte, Tim Uyeki, Sridhar Venkatapuram, Ablo Prudence Wachinou, Ananda Wijewickrama, Dubula Vuyiseka, Jacobus Preller, Romina Brignardello-Petersen, Elena Kum, Anila Qasim, Dena Zeraatkar, Andrew Owen, Gordon Guyatt, Lyubov Lytvyn, Michael Jacobs, Per Olav Vandvik, Janet Diaz |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,211 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 129 | 11% |
| Ecuador | 99 | 8% |
| Italy | 75 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 48 | 4% |
| France | 40 | 3% |
| United States | 36 | 3% |
| Spain | 34 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 29 | 2% |
| Canada | 29 | 2% |
| Other | 134 | 11% |
| Unknown | 558 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1012 | 84% |
| Scientists | 89 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 83 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 27 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 235 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 8% |
| Researcher | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 33 | 14% |
| Unknown | 119 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 19% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 30 | 13% |
| Unknown | 131 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1562. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2023.
All research outputs
#6,865
of 24,513,158 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#194
of 63,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#333
of 425,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#15
of 802 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,513,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 63,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 802 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.