↓ Skip to main content

A living WHO guideline on drugs to prevent covid-19

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
68 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
1334 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor
video
2 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A living WHO guideline on drugs to prevent covid-19
Published in
British Medical Journal, March 2021
DOI 10.1136/bmj.n526
Pubmed ID
Authors

François Lamontagne, Thomas Agoritsas, Reed Siemieniuk, Bram Rochwerg, Jessica Bartoszko, Lisa Askie, Helen Macdonald, Wagdy Amin, Frederique Jacquerioz Bausch, Erlina Burhan, Maurizio Cecconi, Duncan Chanda, Vu Quoc Dat, Bin Du, Heike Geduld, Patrick Gee, Harley Nerina, Madiha Hashimi, Beverley J Hunt, Sushil Kabra, Seema Kanda, Leticia Kawano-Dourado, Yae-Jean Kim, Niranjan Kissoon, Arthur Kwizera, Yee-Sin Leo, Imelda Mahaka, Hela Manai, Greta Mino, Emmanuel Nsutebu, Natalia Pshenichnaya, Nida Qadir, Shalini Sri Ranganathan, Saniya Sabzwari, Rohit Sarin, Michael Sharland, Yinzhong Shen, Joao Paulo Souza, Miriam Stegemann, Sebastian Ugarte, Sridhar Venkatapuram, Dubula Vuyiseka, Jacobus Preller, Romina Brignardello-Petersen, Elena Kum, Anila Qasim, Dena Zeraatkar, Andrew Owen, Gordon Guyatt, Lyubov Lytvyn, Janet Diaz, Per Olav Vandvik, Michael Jacobs

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,334 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 30%
Student > Bachelor 12 16%
Unspecified 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Researcher 6 8%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 3 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 33%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 17 23%
Unspecified 11 15%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 5 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1531. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2021.
All research outputs
#3,605
of 17,512,897 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#121
of 52,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267
of 292,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#8
of 559 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,512,897 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 52,354 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 559 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.