↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for tobacco use prevention in Indigenous youth

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for tobacco use prevention in Indigenous youth
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009325.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristin V Carson, Malcolm P Brinn, Nadina A Labiszewski, Matthew Peters, Anne B Chang, Antony Veale, Adrian J Esterman, Brian J Smith

Abstract

Tobacco use in Indigenous populations (people who have inhabited a country for thousands of years) is often double that in the non-Indigenous population. Addiction to nicotine usually begins during early adolescence and young people who reach the age of 18 as non-smokers are unlikely to become smokers thereafter. Indigenous youth in particular commence smoking at an early age, and a disproportionate burden of substance-related morbidity and mortality exists as a result.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 142 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 26%
Researcher 26 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Other 6 4%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 20 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 27%
Social Sciences 21 14%
Psychology 20 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 27 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2014.
All research outputs
#1,100,273
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,196
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,591
of 139,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.