You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hyperbaric oxygen for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss and tinnitus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004739.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael H Bennett, Tom Kertesz, Matthias Perleth, Philip Yeung, Jan P Lehm |
| Abstract |
This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in The Cochrane Library in Issue 1, 2005 and previously updated in 2007 and 2009.Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSHL) is common and has a significant effect on quality of life. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) may improve oxygen supply to the inner ear and result in an improvement in hearing. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 31% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 23% |
| Ireland | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 23% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 186 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 14% |
| Researcher | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 45 | 24% |
| Unknown | 42 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 93 | 49% |
| Psychology | 10 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Unknown | 45 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,309,443
of 23,479,361 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,015
of 12,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,302
of 177,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#60
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,479,361 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,707 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.