↓ Skip to main content

Hyperbaric oxygen for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss and tinnitus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hyperbaric oxygen for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss and tinnitus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004739.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael H Bennett, Tom Kertesz, Matthias Perleth, Philip Yeung, Jan P Lehm

Abstract

This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in The Cochrane Library in Issue 1, 2005 and previously updated in 2007 and 2009.Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSHL) is common and has a significant effect on quality of life. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) may improve oxygen supply to the inner ear and result in an improvement in hearing.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 3%
Portugal 1 3%
Italy 1 3%
Egypt 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 25 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 73%
Researcher 20 67%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 43%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 37%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 30%
Other 35 117%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 72 240%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 37%
Unspecified 9 30%
Psychology 6 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 17%
Other 7 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2019.
All research outputs
#797,349
of 12,858,386 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,630
of 10,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,460
of 141,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,858,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,449 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.