↓ Skip to main content

Hyperbaric oxygen for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss and tinnitus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hyperbaric oxygen for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss and tinnitus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004739.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael H Bennett, Tom Kertesz, Matthias Perleth, Philip Yeung, Jan P Lehm

Abstract

This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in The Cochrane Library in Issue 1, 2005 and previously updated in 2007 and 2009.Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSHL) is common and has a significant effect on quality of life. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) may improve oxygen supply to the inner ear and result in an improvement in hearing.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 125 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 18%
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Other 37 29%
Unknown 15 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 57%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Psychology 8 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 17 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2020.
All research outputs
#935,749
of 15,474,261 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,654
of 11,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,991
of 149,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,474,261 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,198 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.