↓ Skip to main content

Social media, FOAMed in medical education and knowledge sharing: Local experiences with international perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 185)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
24 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Social media, FOAMed in medical education and knowledge sharing: Local experiences with international perspective
Published in
Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine, September 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.tjem.2016.07.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arif Alper Cevik, Gokhan Aksel, Haldun Akoglu, Serkan Emre Eroglu, Nurettin Ozgur Dogan, Yusuf Ali Altunci

Abstract

Social media, through the Internet and other web-based technologies, have become a means of communication and knowledge-sharing. In this article, we provide details about the social media traffic of various scientific activities, the organizations of which we have played an active role in. We also provide information in our native language through our FOAMed website, which has been published for about 30 months, with us acting as editors. We are comparing these local and limited ventures with examples from the world and aim to remind that social media sources play a very important role in sharing knowledge in medical training and encouraging local initiatives, like ours, with limited resources.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Researcher 7 11%
Other 6 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Other 15 23%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 26%
Computer Science 12 18%
Social Sciences 8 12%
Arts and Humanities 3 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 15 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2019.
All research outputs
#715,336
of 14,093,618 outputs
Outputs from Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine
#5
of 185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,372
of 263,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,093,618 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 185 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.