You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory support during COVID-19 pandemic: a frugal approach from bench to bedside
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-021-00828-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guillaume Carteaux, Manuella Pons, François Morin, Samuel Tuffet, Arnaud Lesimple, Bilal Badat, Anne-Fleur Haudebourg, François Perier, Yvon Deplante, Constance Guillaud, Frédéric Schlemmer, Elena Fois, Nicolas Mongardon, Mehdi Khellaf, Karim Jaffal, Camille Deguillard, Philippe Grimbert, Raphaëlle Huguet, Keyvan Razazi, Nicolas de Prost, François Templier, François Beloncle, Alain Mercat, Laurent Brochard, Vincent Audard, Pascal Lim, Jean-Christophe Richard, Dominique Savary, Armand Mekontso Dessap |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 4 | 24% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 76% |
| Scientists | 3 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 39 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 40 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,504,895
of 23,285,523 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#308
of 1,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,042
of 419,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#12
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,285,523 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.