↓ Skip to main content

Continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory support during COVID-19 pandemic: a frugal approach from bench to bedside

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory support during COVID-19 pandemic: a frugal approach from bench to bedside
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, March 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13613-021-00828-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guillaume Carteaux, Manuella Pons, François Morin, Samuel Tuffet, Arnaud Lesimple, Bilal Badat, Anne-Fleur Haudebourg, François Perier, Yvon Deplante, Constance Guillaud, Frédéric Schlemmer, Elena Fois, Nicolas Mongardon, Mehdi Khellaf, Karim Jaffal, Camille Deguillard, Philippe Grimbert, Raphaëlle Huguet, Keyvan Razazi, Nicolas de Prost, François Templier, François Beloncle, Alain Mercat, Laurent Brochard, Vincent Audard, Pascal Lim, Jean-Christophe Richard, Dominique Savary, Armand Mekontso Dessap

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 13%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 19 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 6%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 18 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,958,066
of 19,272,587 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#213
of 891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,227
of 310,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,272,587 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 891 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them